A Chinese court has recognized the status and capacity of an individual who was appointed as judicial manager by the Singapore High Court pursuant to Article 5 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law.

A Chinese court mentioned possibly for the first time explicitly that de jure reciprocity exists between China and Singapore in terms of recognition and enforcement of each other’s judgments.

ABLI examines the case of CDK v UMW where a Singapore monetary judgment was recognised and enforced in Vietnam in 2018.

Together with experts, ABLI unearths information on the recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial judgments in Vietnam between 1 January 2012 and 30 January 2019.

This year’s online get-together with Foreign Judgments Project contributors and experts took place on June 10.

A Chinese commercial judgment was refused recognition by a New York court.

The March 2021 Issue of the Singapore Journal of Legal Studies published a book review on the Asian Principles for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments.

Asian Principles for Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments is cited in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA [2021] SGCA 14.

In a March 2018 judgment, a court in China’s Shandong Province decided that reciprocity between China and Singapore as established by the Kolmar case only existed in “economic” cases.

A Chinese Court rejected an application for the recognition and enforcement of two South Korean judgments because the period for bringing such an application under Chinese law has expired.