[Judgment] Reciprocity exists only in “economic” cases?
In a March 2018 judgment, a court in China’s Shandong Province decided that reciprocity between China and Singapore as established by the Kolmar case only existed in “economic” cases.
In a March 2018 judgment, a court in China’s Shandong Province decided that reciprocity between China and Singapore as established by the Kolmar case only existed in “economic” cases.
A Chinese Court rejected an application for the recognition and enforcement of two South Korean judgments because the period for bringing such an application under Chinese law has expired.
ABLI sits down with Albert Dinelli, an Australian and English barrister who acted in the first known case where a Chinese commercial judgment was recognised and enforced by the Australian courts.
ABLI speaks to Edmund Kronenburg, managing partner of Braddell Brothers LLP, on how to smoothen cross-border transactions for both lawyers and clients.
Possibly the first ever attempt to have a Myanmar judgment recognised and enforced in China has failed.
Daegu High Court in South Korea recognised a judgment from the People’s Court of Chaoyang District in Beijing on 12 July 2019.
The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court recognised and enforced a judgment issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.
An article by Associate Professor Adeline Chong is published in the first issue of 2020 of the Journal of Private International Law.
ABLI’s Foreign Judgments Project appears to have successfully jump-started a conversation on this important area of the law in Asia.
The Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court in China’s Zhejiang Province recognised civil judgment (S139/2012) by the High Court of Singapore.